What  is  Chess ?

 

In the September-October 1962 issue of the American

Chess Bulletin there was an article by William L. Napier of

Washington, D.C., under the above title.   Here are some excerpts

from his article, followed by a  few thoughts on the subject

from other sources.

 

"Leibnitz (1646-l7l6) is said to have described chess as

“too much of a game for a science and too much of a science

for a game”.  This was high commendation from the genius who

disputed priority with Newton in the discovery of calculus.

Unfortunately, however, his witty phrase, shrewd as it is and

apt, tells us rather what chess is not than what it is.

 

"Facetiously, someone has said the game is closely akin to

salesmanship, which has been described as the 'art of letting

the other fellow have your way' ... by own thought, founded

on life-long association with players of many nations and many

grades, is that chess is the playground of intellectual

combativeness.  No other game stands close enough to this

definition to claim lt; for chess, however, it is a snug fit, and

the players who do not fit the definition are those who for

good reasons of their own do not wish to mar their restful fun

with undue mental exertion.

 

"Chess, serious chess, is peculiarly a mental exercise for

those positive characters who enjoy downing stout opposition;

men, indeed, who carry the competitive spirit of their nature

or their daily pursuits over into their hours of leisure and

recreation... While it would be idle to argue that chess

demands any special mental equipment, yet the temptation here

is strong to talk of a typical chess mind.  That mind, if such

there be, will assuredly be independent, skeptical, eagerly

objective and resourceful; and it will not be restrained by

overmuch meekness of the sort that makes not leaders but

fellowers."

 

George Bernard Shaw described chess as "a foolish

expedient for making idle people believe they are doing

something very clever, when they are only wasting their time." 

In 1732 Thomas Fuller wrote: When a man's house is on fire,

it is time to break off chess." Emanuel Lasker said: "by some

ardent enthusiasts chess has been elevated into a science or

an art.  It is neither.  Its principal characteristic seems

to be what human nature mostly delights in -- a fight."

 

Siegbert Tarrasch wrote: "Chess is a form of intellectual

productiveness; therein lies its peculiar charm.  Intellectual

productiveness is one of the greatest joys, if not the greatest one,

of human existence.  It is not everyone who can write a play,

or build a bridge, or even make a good joke.  But in chess

everyone can, everyone must, be intellectually productive

and so can share in this select delight.  I have always a slight

feeling of pity for the man who has no knowledge of chess,

just as I would pity a man who has remained ignorant of love. 

Chess, like love, like music, has the power to make man happy."

 

How about: "Chess is a damned good game" ?

 

    Ben McCready

 

 

robroy8.tripod.com

 

        My friend, Ben McCready, wrote a weekly chess column

for the “Newtown Bee” newspaper of Newtown Connecticut.

He lived in Heritage Circle, part of the famous Heritage Village

of Southbury Connecticut.

        I used to drop by his condo/apartment to visit him after work

when I had my job at Southbury Training School in the late 1970’s.

        He was a very friendly person.  I remembered he was not

allowed at the Heritage Village Chess Club because he was a renter,

as opposed to a condo-owner.  How unfortunate for them, as he

was a very strong player and should have been warmly welcomed

as an asset to any chess club.

        Ben has sinced passed on, and I will always remember him

as the nice friendly fellow he was.

 

                                              Rob Roy

 

http://www.facebook.com/ConnecticutChessMagazine